Bloggens emner

Blogarkiv

The brand new authors advertised the test-retest accuracy just like the: Roentgen

The brand new authors advertised the test-retest accuracy just like the: Roentgen

Body dissatisfaction. In order to measure body dissatisfaction (difference between actual and ideal figure) and internalization of the ideal thin figure (defined as the selection of a thin silhouette from a group of silhouettes of various body sizes), a set of 10 silhouettes assumed to be neutral to ethnicity, culture, and details (Figure 1) was used. A German work group (Jaeger, Massoubre & Lamprecht, 2000) originally developed these for a previous multi-cross-cultural study in a three-stdecades peer revision procedure. Four questions were asked in relation to the silhouette scales: “Please mark with a cross the silhouette that best represents the current shape of your body”; “What do you wish you looked like?”; “What is the most attractive silhouette in your opinion?”; “What do you find the most attractive silhouette in the opposite sex?” Participants were asked to mark with a cross the position representing their attitudes on a 0-10 decimal scale (Figure 1); positions between the two silhouettes were allowed and coded as real numbers. tt= 0.82 (“actual”); Rtt= 0.77 (“ideal”); Rtt= 0.71 (“attractive”); and those of convergent validity as: Rcit= 0.73 (“actual” and BMI). The procedures followed by the authors, as well as the psychometric features, are described in detail elsewhere (Jaeger et al., 2002; Jaeger et al., 2000).

Slimming down restraint esposa Puerto Rico is mentioned of the Diet Scale of one’s Dining Attitudes Take to (EAT) (Garner, Olmsted, Bohr & Garfinkel, 1982), composed of 16 comments scored toward a good 6-section level (never ever = 0/always = 5), that have high scores proving an advanced level of restrained eating. For the Eat psychometrical features select Gather ainsi que al. (1982). The structure coefficient both for trials, the brand new Mexican and you may German of them, is of the same value, a leader off 0.76.

Fat loss discipline

Ineffectiveness level. This new bad apply to basis are estimated through the Ineffectiveness Measure regarding this new Restaurants Issues Inventory (EDI) (Garner et al., 1983), which has shown an excellent convergent validity (ineffectiveness/self esteem ) of R = 0.70 (p

Medical teams got the extra weight and you can height steps

Bmi (BMI). Bmi was calculated due to the fact pounds during the kilograms split up because of the top within the square meters (Body mass index = kg/m2).

Just before study range, an effective pilot study of the Silhouettes Level (Shape 1), used on a sample including 20 Mexican pupils, was applied to test new appropriateness of the data so you’re able to depict human anatomy items, so you can validate a good acceptation away from an unknown gang of silhouettes and you may a definite knowledge of the fresh new recommendations (the newest German classification currently measured that have analysis contained in this respect). The results demonstrated the fresh new Outline Measure are a good or an enthusiastic suitable means into North american country shot.

New detectives of the two places, within Mexico Town and at Hae (standardized) procedure. This new surveys was in fact applied to categories of medical and breastfeeding college students from the North american country and you may German colleges. One of the reasons at the rear of brand new ples away from people associated with medicine are precisely the focus one (you can imagine) such young people must have toward medical profession and also for illnesses, making them a great deal more responsive to problems such ED. Informed consent is actually obtained from every studies players. All the called children provided to participate. New particular regional ethics committees approved the fresh non-intrusive processes. Top-notch translators undertook and controlled the latest translation and you may retranslation of your own tools.

Age. The mean age of Mexican women (Mage = 20.4, SD = 0.49) and German women (Mage = 20.8, SD = 1.0) differed statistically: t(346)= 4.29, p = 0.000. It is important to note that we expected not to find a significant difference in this variable, but a minimal difference of a few tenths (0.4) resulted in a significant one, most likely due to the large size of the total sample, since in separate structural analysis, age accounted for

Leave a Reply